State v. Cornelius
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1ConcurrenceDouglas, J.
I concur specially in the result reached by my Brothers Brock and Bois. I am not prepared to overrule Shutt at this time, although the concern over the use or potential abuse of breathalyzer evidence implied in the opinion of the dissenters is not without merit. I would overrule Shutt prospectively, however, as of February 1, 1983, because of the State’s good-faith reliance on it in the past in the important task of highway safety.
Due process under part I, article 15 of the New Hampshire Constitution is a flexible standard as are the remedies available to effectuate relief consistent with it.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.