Legal Opinion
Center for Biological Diversity v. Lueckel
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided December 6, 2002No. 2:01-cv-00194PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
QUIST, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Center for Biological Diversity, Northwoods Wilderness Recovery, and Superior Wilderness Action Network, have sued Defendants, Robert Lueckel, Ottawa National Forest Supervisor, Thomas A. Schmidt, Hiawatha National Forest Supervisor, and Ann M. Venneman, United States Secretary of Agriculture, pursuant to the Administrative Procedures Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. §§ 701 to 706. Plaintiffs allege that the United States Forest Service (“Forest Service”) failed to comply with: (1) the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (“WSRA”), 16 U.S.C. §§ 1271 to 1287, by preparing…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Center for Biological Diversity v. Robert Lueckel, Ottawa National Forest SupervisorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Romantics v. Activision Publishing, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2008
- Ctr for Biological v. VenemanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005