Legal Opinion

Gary Romano v. Gary Newton

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided September 6, 2007No. 03-06-00255-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-06-00255-CV Gary Romano, Appellant v. Gary Newton, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BASTROP COUNTY, 335TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 24,929, HONORABLE TERRY L. FLENNIKEN, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION Gary Romano appeals from the district court’s post-answer default judgment awarding Gary Newton $176,150.68 in actual damages, $6,216.21 in attorney’s fees, interest and costs, and its order overruling his motion for new trial. For the reasons we explain below, we affirm the district court’s judgment conditioned on Newton’s remittitur…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Cire v. CummingsTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Holt Atherton Industries, Inc. v. HeineTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Walker v. GutierrezTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Stoner v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1979

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API