Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Matre v. Bergs

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1928PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtVinje, C. J.

Whether the right to the office of president of a corporation can be acquired and held by virtue of a contract with the corporation is not necessary to decide in this case, for it is obvious that if it can be so acquired it must be by clear and express contract to that effect. It cannot be by doubtful and ambiguous terms or by inference. Wé have carefully examined the contracts between the parties to this controversy and are unable to find such a contract. They all, except that part of a contract set out above, relate to. the formation of a Wisconsin corporation, the sale of patents, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brand v. GodwinNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1890
  2. Torbett v. EatonNew York Supreme Court · 1888
  3. United States v. MeansU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1889
  4. Thomas F. Meton & Sons, Ltd. v. Isham Wagon Co.New York Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Eastham v. York State Telephone Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cosgriff v. Duluth Firemen's Relief Assn.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API