Legal Opinion

Schoultz v. Keller

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 7, 1927PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLeche, J.

Plaintiffs pray to be declared owners of a tract of land situated in the parish of St. Tammany. They allege and set forth their title, and further say that they are informed that defendant asserts his ownership thereof and that neither they nor defendant, Keller, are in possession. The action is brought under Act 38, p. 38, of 1908.

Defendant claims that he and his co-owners are in possession and that fact seems to be supported by the evidence in the record, but defendant does not say who are his co-owners. The action then must be viewed as an ordinary petitory action, subject to the rules…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Byrne v. HebertSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1898
  2. Cutno v. Weil Bros.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
  3. De Soto's Heirs v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1916

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Blanchard v. MartelLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API