Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Appeal of Belk-Broome Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 18, 1995No. 9310PTC1319PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

We first address Belk’s argument that the Commission violated principles of due process by basing its decision exclusively on the cost approach after inducing Belk not to submit evidence on the cost approach. The record reveals that the Commission indicated it would place little reliance on the cost approach and encouraged Belk not to spend time presenting evidence on that approach. Belk accordingly limited its presentation of testimonial evidence and cross-examination on the cost approach. Belk did submit its appraiser’s report which contained a cost approach analysis, but…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re the Appeal of AMP Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc. v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  3. Coastal Eagle Point Oil Co. v. West Deptford TownshipNew Jersey Tax Court · 1993
  4. Magna Investment & Development Corp. v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
  5. Pittman v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. In Re Appeal of the Greens of Pine Glen Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
  2. In Re Appeal of ParsonsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  3. In Re the Appeal of Interstate Income Fund ICourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  4. Appeal of Philip Morris USACourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  5. In Re Appeal of Blue Ridge Mall LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API