Legal Opinion

Bell v. Barefield

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 9, 1929No. 4 Div. 438PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

(after stating the facts as above). The court, in ordering the sale of the lands for division among the joint owners, proceeded on the theory that the deed from Edward Barefield and wife to Dora Brown and Robert L. Barefield reserved a life estate in the grantors with vested remainder in the grantees. There is nothing in this conveyance, so far as appears, imposing any duty on the life tenant to preserve the property or insure it for the benefit of the remaindermen, and there is nothing in the conveyance made by Nancy Jane Barefield and her children, other than the complainant, to Dora Brown…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Harrison v. PepperMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  2. Welsh v. London Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  3. Thompson v. GearheartSupreme Court of Virginia · 1923
  4. Miles v. MilesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  5. Green v. GreenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1897

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Keesecker v. BirdWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Westchester Fire Ins. Co. of New York v. GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  3. American Equitable Assur. Co. v. Powderly Coal & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  4. Gorman's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Russell v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API