Legal Opinion

Snay v. Prouty

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided September 19, 1994No. 89-1416Published

1Opinion of the CourtFremont-Smith, J.

The issue in this case is whether defendants properly exercised their option to purchase real estate of the plaintiff, or whether the option was never validly exercised so that plaintiff remains the owner. For the reasons stated below, the Court concludes that the option was not validly exercised so that the plaintiff remains the owner of the premises.

FINDINGS OF FACT

On October 10, 1978, plaintiffs parents, Edmund L. Snay and Margaret L. Snay, both deceased, entered into an option agreement with the defendants whereby the defendants were provided with an option to purchase certain real estate…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fashion House, Inc. v. K Mart Corporation, Fashion House, Inc. v. K Mart CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  2. Freelander v. G. & K. REALTY CORP.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
  3. Virginia T. Gillentine v. Maxwell N. McKeand Lawrence MooreCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
  4. Dean S. Edmonds, Jr. v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
  5. Chemawa Country Golf, Inc. v. WnukMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API