Legal Opinion

Nye v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 29, 1979No. Appeal, No. 1899 C.D. 1977PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Crumlish, Jr.,

The Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirmed a referee’s dismissal of a claim for compensation under Section 108(q) of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act1 and Section *100301 (i) of the Pennsylvania Occupational Disease Act.2 John R. Nye appeals. We affirm in part.3

Claimant, John R. Nye, filed two claim petitions: one on January 17, 1975, under Section 301 (i) of the Pennsylvania Occupational Disease Act and the second on August 14, 1975, under Section 301(g) of the Act4 claiming that he suffered from totally disabling anthraco silicosis as a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board of the Commonwealth v. WlodarczykCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board of the Commonwealth v. International Furnace Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Kuchinski v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McHale v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Helverson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Department of Labor & Industry v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Bender v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Sihelnik v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API