Gould v. Pennington County Board of Equalization
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
TAPPE, Circuit Judge.
[¶ 1.] Michael and Marnie Gould (Goulds) are challenging the constitutionality of SDCL 10-6-58 which provides that:
Any agricultural land, as defined in SDCL 10-6-31.3, which sells for more than one hundred fifty percent of its agricultural income value is hereby classified for purposes of ad valorem taxation. The agricultural income value shall be determined pursuant to SDCL 10-6-62.
[¶ 2.] Agricultural land is defined in SDCL 10-6-31.3. 1
[¶ 3.] Goulds argue that the effect of 10-6-58 is to create a separate class of agricultural land, in violation of art. VIII, § 15 of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Charge of Sedlacek v. South Dakota Teener Baseball ProgramSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Cary v. City of Rapid CitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Hot Springs Independent School District No. 10 v. Fall River Landowners Ass'nSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. WhitfieldSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
- Simmons v. EricsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Wuest v. Winner School District 59-2South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Shevling v. Butte County Board of CommissionersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Fall River County v. South Dakota Public Assurance AllianceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Thares v. Brown County Board of EqualizationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Fall River Co. v. S.D. Public Assurance AllianceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.