Legal Opinion

State v. Love

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 9, 1974No. 43852PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant and a female codefendant, jointly tried by a district court jury, were acquitted of unlawful possession of seconal with intent to sell, but convicted of unlawful possession of both seconal and amphetamines. Defendant, who appeals from judgment of conviction, contends that the trial court erred in admitting into evidence, over objection as to relevancy, a handgun, a clip of shells, and certain narcotics paraphernalia, found by police on the premises where defendant was arrested. We have concluded that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting all of these items.

The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. GrunauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  2. United States v. John Thomas AllenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  3. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  4. United States v. Charles CannonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. DanielsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. State v. SimonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. State v. KochendorferSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. State v. SuedelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API