State v. Love
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Per curiam
Defendant and a female codefendant, jointly tried by a district court jury, were acquitted of unlawful possession of seconal with intent to sell, but convicted of unlawful possession of both seconal and amphetamines. Defendant, who appeals from judgment of conviction, contends that the trial court erred in admitting into evidence, over objection as to relevancy, a handgun, a clip of shells, and certain narcotics paraphernalia, found by police on the premises where defendant was arrested. We have concluded that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting all of these items.
The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. GrunauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- United States v. John Thomas AllenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- United States v. Charles CannonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. DanielsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. SimonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- State v. KochendorferSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. SuedelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982