Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Rheinfrank v. Gienow

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1969No. 69-349PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an action in mandamus originating in this court.

Relators seek to compel the respondent, Director of Public Works, to hold a hearing pursuant to the provisions of Section 123.61, Revised Code, to determine the title to the bed of the water on which relators’ property abuts.

A demurrer has been filed to the petition and both relators and respondent agree that an order overruling the demurrer will be dispositive of the case.

Relators are the owners of certain lands abutting on the Maumee River. The state, on the theory that the waters on which relators’ property abuts is a part of Lake…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. West Park Shopping Center, Inc. v. MasheterOhio Supreme Court · 1966

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cushing v. CohenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  2. Hoyman v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API