Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. United States Postal Service
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EDWARDS, Senior Circuit Judge:
This case arises from Appellants’— Sears, Roebuck and Co. (“Sears”), Segerdahl Graphics, Inc. (“Segerdahl”), and Aspen Marketing Services, LLC (“Aspen”)— use of the United States Postal Service (“Postal Service”) for delivery of bulk mailings. In 2009, Appellants mailed over 8.2 million folded self-mailers, i.e, mail that can be folded and sent without envelopes, for which they paid postage at a discounted automation rate. To qualify for the discounted rate, Appellants certified that their mailings met the applicable sealing requirements for oblong self-mailers.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Martin v. Occupational Safety & Health Review CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Greater Boston Television Corp. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- Air Courier Conference of America v. American Postal Workers UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- National Association of Postal Supervisors v. USPSCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2022
- Eagle Trust Fund v. U.S. Postal Serv.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Susan PiochCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
- Changji Esquel Textile Co. Ltd. v. RaimondoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
- Dscc v. TrumpDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.