Legal Opinion

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. United States Postal Service

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided December 20, 2016No. 15-5330PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDWARDS, Senior Circuit Judge:

This case arises from Appellants’— Sears, Roebuck and Co. (“Sears”), Segerdahl Graphics, Inc. (“Segerdahl”), and Aspen Marketing Services, LLC (“Aspen”)— use of the United States Postal Service (“Postal Service”) for delivery of bulk mailings. In 2009, Appellants mailed over 8.2 million folded self-mailers, i.e, mail that can be folded and sent without envelopes, for which they paid postage at a discounted automation rate. To qualify for the discounted rate, Appellants certified that their mailings met the applicable sealing requirements for oblong self-mailers.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Martin v. Occupational Safety & Health Review CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Greater Boston Television Corp. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  5. Air Courier Conference of America v. American Postal Workers UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. National Association of Postal Supervisors v. USPSCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2022
  2. Eagle Trust Fund v. U.S. Postal Serv.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
  3. United States v. Susan PiochCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
  4. Changji Esquel Textile Co. Ltd. v. RaimondoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
  5. Dscc v. TrumpDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API