Legal Opinion
Brody v. Brody
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 6, 2008PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Robert A. Ross, J.
This application of Domestic Relations Law § 250, effective July 3, 2007, appears to be of first impression, there being no reported cases since the enactment of this statute, intended by the New York Legislature to address its stated legislative purpose of preserving intact marriages.
“It is unlikely in the context of a marriage that the party will move to contest or change the terms of prenuptial agreement until a proceeding has begun to dissolve the marriage itself. Most parties would not contest the validity or terms of a prenuptial agreement or…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Leon v. MartinezNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Friends of Animals, Inc. v. Associated Fur Manufacturers, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Phillips v. Joseph Kantor & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Rainbow v. SwisherNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rosenzweig v. GivensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009