Worthington v. Hiss
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeals from the Circuit Court of Baltimore City. These appeals were taken from an order of the Court below, (Dennis, J.,) sustaining the exceptions of P. Hanson Hiss and others to the auditor’s reports and accounts A, B, C and D, and rejecting the same, and overruling the exceptions of Thomas Worthington and others to the said accounts, except so far as said accounts A and B, are confirmed by said order. ’The case is stated in the opinion of this Court.
1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.
After the remand of this case on the second appeal (67 Md., 139,) the Circuit Court, being so instructed by this Court, passed a decree, dated the 23rd of May, 1887, for a partition of the common property, and directed that the shares of the Worthingtons and Knapps therein should be allotted to them out of the unimproved part now in possession of the devisees of Philip Hiss. This partition and allotment have been made, and to this extent the litigation seems to be ended. It was decided on the first appeal (62 Md., 33,) that the Worthingtons were entitled as tenants in common to an undivided…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Long v. LongCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1884
- Gittings v. WorthingtonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1887
- Mitchell v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1856
3Cited by22 opinions
- Boone v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1967
- Hogan v. McMahonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1911
- Bradford v. Eutaw Savings BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
- Washington Mutual Bank v. HomanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- Capital Garage Co. v. PowellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1925
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.