Legal Opinion

Glens Falls Group Insurance Corp. v. Hoium

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 4, 1972No. 43319PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Otis, Justice.

This is an action brought by a liability insurer, Glens Falls Group Insurance Corporation, seeking to construe its policy to exclude coverage for injuries inflicted by its insured, James Sheehan, on David Hoium in a barroom altercation on June 10, 1969. The trial court found that Glens Falls was obliged to defend Sheehan but declined to pass on whether Glens Falls was obligated to indemnify Sheehan in the event of Hoium’s recovery. Glens Falls appeals.

The policy excludes coverage for torts intentionally inflicted. The issue raised on appeal is whether, as a result of Sheehan’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Travelers Insurance Company v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  2. Kvanli v. Village of WatsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  3. Warren v. MarshSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  4. Jankowski v. ClausenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  5. Klein v. PaschSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Brohawn v. Transamerica InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. James v. PaulSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
  3. Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. McGrathCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  4. Allstate Insurance v. Dziuk (In Re Dziuk)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
  5. PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INS. v. KollarNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API