Legal Opinion
Zambrana v. City of New York
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 17, 2000PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
We agree with the majority memorandum of the Appellate Division. We further note that plaintiff failed to identify any triable issue of fact with respect to whether defendant had notice of the reckless conduct of other skaters in order to defeat defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562).
Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley and Rosenblatt concur.
Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
3Cited by13 opinions
- Roberts v. Boys & Girls Republic, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Vega v. County of WestchesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Bleyer v. Recreational Management Service Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Newcomb v. Guptill Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. TinkhamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.