STATE OF MISSOURI v. MICKEY R. COPELAND
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtDaniel E. Scott, P.J.
OPINION AUTHOR
Mickey Copeland appeals a conviction-for manufacturing methamphetamine. He does not dispute the sufficiency of evidence which we describe only as needed to explain why we deny two claims of trial error and affirm the conviction.
Background
Investigators suspected Steven Taylor of operating a motel meth lab. Tipped that Taylor might be with Copeland at 207 Maple Street in Arcadia, officers went there and found Taylor and evidence of another meth lab (Taylor later went to prison).
INPLEX research that evening revealed suspicious pseudoephedrine purchases by Copeland and his…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. SandersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- State v. CrawfordMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
- State v. McMillianMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- State v. SnowdenMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. FakesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.