Legal Opinion

STATE OF MISSOURI v. MICKEY R. COPELAND

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 3, 2015No. SD33632Published

1Opinion of the CourtDaniel E. Scott, P.J.

OPINION AUTHOR

Mickey Copeland appeals a conviction-for manufacturing methamphetamine. He does not dispute the sufficiency of evidence which we describe only as needed to explain why we deny two claims of trial error and affirm the conviction.

Background

Investigators suspected Steven Taylor of operating a motel meth lab. Tipped that Taylor might be with Copeland at 207 Maple Street in Arcadia, officers went there and found Taylor and evidence of another meth lab (Taylor later went to prison).

INPLEX research that evening revealed suspicious pseudoephedrine purchases by Copeland and his…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. SandersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. State v. CrawfordMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. State v. McMillianMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. State v. SnowdenMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. State v. FakesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API