Legal Opinion
People v. Fiorello
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 18, 2012PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Inasmuch as “the defendant received the minimum sentence permitted by law, this Court has no authority to reduce [the sentence] as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice” (People v Howard, 50 AD3d 823, 823 [2008]; see CPL 470.20 [6]; Penal Law §§ 70.00 [3] [a] [ii]; 220.41; People v Wilson, 28 AD3d 796, 797 [2006]; People v Muller, 294 AD2d 602 [2002]). Mastro, A.P.J., Rivera, Belen, Roman and Sgroi, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. HowardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. MullerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- People v. WilsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. BarberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. LopezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- BARBER, STEPHEN M., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. AnastasiouAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
- People v. BarberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.