Legal Opinion
Pomerantz v. Wolfin
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 3, 1997PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, etc., the defendants David R. Barron, Ruth S. Kleier, Daniel F. Richfield, and David R. Barron, M.D., Inc. d/b/a Richfield Laboratory of Dermatopathology appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCabe, J.), dated April 29, 1996, as denied their motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (8) to dismiss the complaint insofar as it is asserted against them for lack of personal jurisdiction.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs payable to the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kreutter v. McFadden Oil Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. Concert Connection, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Schur v. PorterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kostal v. Pinkus Dermatopathology Laboratory, P.C.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005
- Reyes v. Sanchez-PenaNew York Supreme Court · 2002
- Allen v. Institute for Family HealthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018