In re the Estate of Mead
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Decree affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: VvTe do not find petitioner’s [respondent’s] failure, before he applied for letters of administration, to pay the State for the hospitalization of his wife to be the neglect or abandonment under section 87 of the Decedent Estate Law, which deprives him of a distributive share of the estate of his decedent wife. The fact that petitioner had instituted an action for annulment is not in itself án abandonment, nor does it ipso facto indicate that he would decline to assume the burden of support should the court deny him…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re the Estate of MaidenNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- In re the Estate of SadowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
- In re the Estate of BarcNew York Surrogate's Court · 1941
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
- In re the Estate of BoothNew York Surrogate's Court · 1949
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the Estate of LapennaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
- In re the Estate of SchinzingNew York Surrogate's Court · 1956
- Schine v. SchineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971