Legal Opinion · Dissent

Brookview Holdings, LLC v. Suarez

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 29, 2007No. A06A2471Published

1DissentAndrews, Presiding Judge

The majority holds that Brookview’s abandonment of the security measures undertaken by its predecessor amounts to a breach of a “contractual duty” sufficient, without any showing of actual negligence, to defeat Brookview’s motion for summary judgment (p. 94). This flouts longstanding precedent, quoted by the majority, that the breach of an assumed duty is actionable only “ ‘if.. . it also violates a duty owed to [a] plaintiff independent of contract to avoid harming him’ ” (p. 94, emphasis supplied, quoting Orkin Exterminating Co. v. Stevens, 130 Ga. App. 363, 365 (203 SE2d 587) (1973)).…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  2. Orkin Exterminating Co. v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  3. Agnes Scott College, Inc. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  4. Baker v. Simon Property Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  5. Doe v. Prudential-Bache/A.G. Spanos Realty PartnersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API