Legal Opinion
State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. Castro
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided October 27, 1982No. WCB No. 80-02536, CA A23020PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.
The State Accident Insurance Fund (SAIF) appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board that affirmed a referee’s decision ordering SAIF to commence payment of compensation awarded by this court before our mandate issued.
A recitation of the procedural history of the claim is appropriate. SAIF denied the claim, contending that claimant had not suffered a compensable injury. Claimant requested a hearing. A referee agreed that the claim was not compensable. The Board affirmed. Claimant appealed to this court. We issued our opinion reversing the Board. 44 Or App 296, 605 P2d 1389 (1980).…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re the Guardianship of BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- Dalton v. JohnsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Kelly's AdministratrixCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
- Matter of Marriage of NorrisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- WOLFE INVESTMENTS, INC. v. ShroyerOregon Supreme Court · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lemley v. LemleyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Harrison v. HarrisonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- State v. GubitosiSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- Bracke v. Baza'r, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986