Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lumsden v. Erstine

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 7, 1943No. 4-7077Published

1DissentSmith, J.

The state government must function, but, to do so, it'must have the necessary revenue. For many years these revenues were derived chiefly from the ad valorem taxes assessed against and collected upon property both real and personal. Later, and from time to time, additional sources of revenue have been provided, but the ad- valorem tax remains a sub-, stantial and essential part of the state’s revenues.

The method provided by law for the- enforcement of the payment of the taxes on real estate is to sell the land on which the owner had failed, or refused, to pay the delinquent taxes. The…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Fuller v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  2. McCarter v. NeilSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1887
  3. Porter v. DooleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1898
  4. Pattison v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  5. Wallace v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1860

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API