Legal Opinion

Garrison v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided March 27, 1928No. 8 Div. 651PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The evidence for the state tended to prove defendant guilty under both counts of the indictment, hence charges 1, 3, and 4 were properly refused.

The criminal jurisdiction of the state extends and covers all federal forest reservations lying and being in this state, and for that reason charge 2 was properly refused.

Refused charge 5 is as follows:

"I charge you that the defendant has offered you evidence of his previous good character. This you should take into consideration along with all the other evidence in the case. A man whose previous character is shown by the evidence to have been good,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hussey v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  2. Felix v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1851
  3. Kilgore v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  4. Morgan v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  5. Reddick v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1889

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Crews v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Morris v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1949
  3. Hagood v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1929
  4. Whaley v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1928
  5. Oldham v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API