Legal Opinion
Garrison v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
Decided March 27, 1928No. 8 Div. 651PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The evidence for the state tended to prove defendant guilty under both counts of the indictment, hence charges 1, 3, and 4 were properly refused.
The criminal jurisdiction of the state extends and covers all federal forest reservations lying and being in this state, and for that reason charge 2 was properly refused.
Refused charge 5 is as follows:
"I charge you that the defendant has offered you evidence of his previous good character. This you should take into consideration along with all the other evidence in the case. A man whose previous character is shown by the evidence to have been good,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hussey v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- Felix v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1851
- Kilgore v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
- Morgan v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
- Reddick v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1889
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Crews v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1928
- Morris v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1949
- Hagood v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1929
- Whaley v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1928
- Oldham v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1953