Legal Opinion

Nies v. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 5, 1935No. Appeal, 6PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Simpson,

By a written agreement, executed by plaintiff and defendant, the former became agent for the latter, to solicit, inter alia, fidelity and surety bonds to be executed by defendant, for which services he was to receive twenty per centum of the premium received by defendant for entering the bonds. Admittedly, defendant executed a bond for |2,484,000 for the Wiley Maxon Company of Dayton, Ohio, conditioned for their construction of a bridge across the Susquehanna River between the Boroughs of Columbia and Wrightsville, Pa., in accordance with the terms of their…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dimmick v. Banning, Cooper & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  2. Fowler v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  3. Sharp v. KeiserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. Suits to Use v. Aetna C. S. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Amsler v. McClureSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lucacher v. KersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  2. Dime Bk. Tr. Co. v. Walsh Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. King v. BoettcherCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Guschefsky v. Hazle Brook Coal Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Schuylkill County1936
  5. Sweigart v. Schaffer B. & L. Ass'n, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API