Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Wilmot

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided January 15, 1903Published

Proceedings upon the final judicial settlement of the account» of Julia A. Moore, as administratrix with the annexed of said Clarissa Wilmot, deceased.

1Opinion of the Court

Willis, S.

There is a controversy in this proceeding in regard to two claims which have been presented against this-, estate. One claim is presented by Alice Orcutt, and the other *419claim is presented by Alice Orcutt as administratrix with the will annexed of Daniel W. Wilmot, deceased.

Both claims were rejected by the representative of this esr tate, and are now before the court in pursuance of a consent and stipulation that the surrogate hear and determine said claims in this proceeding.

The alleged claim presented by Alice Orcutt consists of the following items: “ Board of the decedent, money…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kearney v. . McKeonNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Mowry v. . PeetNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  3. Hughes v. DavenportAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  4. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of JonesNew York Surrogate's Court · 1899
  5. Riche v. MartinCity of New York Municipal Court · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API