Legal Opinion

Scott v. Stringley

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1892No. 15,910PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From the Fulton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtCoffey, J.

— Section 1193, Elliott's Supplement, provides, among other things, that after the construction of any public ditch the county surveyor of the county in which the proceedings were had for its construction shall keep the same in repair to the full dimensions as to width and depth as required in the original specifications, and certify the cost thereof, including his own per diem, to the county auditor, who shall draw his warrants on the county treasurer, payable to the persons to whom the money is owing, which warrants shall, for the time being, be paid out of the county revenue. It provides…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Weaver v. TemplinIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Markley v. RudyIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Kirkpatrick v. TaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Amoss v. LassellIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. City of Indianapolis v. GilmoreIndiana Supreme Court · 1868

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Zimmerman v. SavageIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Madison County Drainage BoardDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1995
  3. Romack v. HobbsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API