Legal Opinion

Hall v. Crailo Sweets, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1941PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

From the notice of motion served herein, it is difficult to determine under what specific provisions of the Civil Practice Act defendants seek relief. Defendants argue in their memorandum that they are moving pursuant to the provisions of section 271 *121of the Civil Practice Act, but later submit arguments based upon the proposition that they seek merely the right to .serve an amended answer, the time to serve such answer as of course having expired.

This is a stockholders’ derivative action, plaintiffs seeking to redress wrongs allegedly done to the corporation, for- breach of contract. The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. General Investment Corp. v. WarrinerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hall ex rel. Crailo Sweets, Inc. v. Crailo Sweets, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API