Legal Opinion

Woolf v. Gray

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1916No. 2812PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from District Court, Fourth District, Hon. A. B. Morgan, Judge. Action by Isaac Woolf against Enoch Gray and another. From a judgment for defendant Gray, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.

The plaintiff brought this action, as stated in the title thereof, against Enoch Gray and Henry Rawlings, defendants. The plaintiff as a first cause of action, alleged:

That "between the 5th day of October, 1891, and the 16th day of March, 1892, one W. S. McCornick was doing business under the name of California Wine Company” at Salt Lake City, Utah; that during said times said "defendants were partners, doing business as Rawlings & Gray, at Provo, Utah; that during said times the said W. S. McCornick sold and delivered to said defendants, at their request, upon credit, goods, wares and…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Richmond Irr. Co. v. ShawUtah Supreme Court · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API