Legal Opinion

Cook v. Cook

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 11, 1912PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Petition for injunction. Before Judge Roan. Campbell superior court. July 15, 1911.

1Opinion of the CourtLumpkin, J.

1. If a man takes a homestead for the benefit of his wife and children, and after the death of his wife he remarries during the minority of some of the children, his second wife becomes a beneficiary of the homestead. Torrance v. Boyd, 63 Ga. 22; Dismuke v. Eady & Co., 80 Ga. 289 (5 S. E. 494).

2. Where a man took a homestead and his children became of age, upon his death, leaving his wife as the only beneficiary of the homestead estate, she could take a year’s support out of the homestead property; and if the amount thereof did not include the entire homestead, she could also take dower out…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lowe v. WebbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  2. Green v. HambrickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  3. Miller v. CrozierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  4. Torrance v. BoydSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
  5. Roff, Sims & Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1869

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Walden v. WaldenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  2. Mize v. HarberSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  3. Miers v. MiersMississippi Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API