Legal Opinion

Arana v. Ochsner Health Plan

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 8, 2003No. 01-30922Published

1Opinion of the Court

EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge:

This case was remanded to “the panel” pursuant to a decision of the en banc court that we have federal jurisdiction. See Arana v. Ochsner Health Plan, Inc., 302 F.3d 462, 470-74 (5th Cir.2002), rev’d en banc, 338 F.3d 433 (5th Cir.2003). We now hold that because Arana’s claim against Ochsner Health Plan (“OHP”) fails as a matter of Louisiana law, no question of conflict with federal ERISA law exists.

I. BACKGROUND

On July 5, 1998, Julio Arana (“Arana”) suffered serious injuries when the 1995 Nissan Pathfinder he was driving was struck by a 1996 Ford Crown Victoria.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Price v. Federal Express Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  2. Arana v. Ochsner Health PlanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  3. United States v. Lester Irvin ReevesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  4. Abl Mgmt. v. Board of Sup'rs of S. Univ.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
  5. Barreca v. CobbSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API