Legal Opinion

Mintz v. Kerry

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1957PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVincent A. Lupiano, J.

The plaintiffs, Charlotte and Lee Mintz, copartners doing business as The Mint Factors, sue the defendant, George Kerr, for the nonpayment of a trade acceptance wherein defendant allegedly undertook to pay the sum of $660 on June 4,1955. Claiming themselves to be holders in due course, they press for payment.

*77The plaintiffs are engaged in the business of commercial financing with offices in New York City. The defendant is the owner of the South End Garage in South Fallsburg, New York.

Plaintiffs claim that on or about May 4, 1955 Harvey Stern-man and Paul Landis, representing themselves to be…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Merson v. Sun InsuranceCivil Court of the City of New York · 1964
  2. Broad & Wall Corp. v. O'ConnorNew York Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API