Legal Opinion
Fenzl v. City of Houston
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided July 14, 1933No. 9961PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRAVES, Justice.
This appeal is from a judgment below perpetually enjoining appellants, at the suit of the City of Houston, from obstructing what was found to be a public street within the city’s limits, the material substance thereof being as follows:
“Upon hearing the pleadings, evidence, and argument of counsel, and being fully advised, it appears unto the Court that the law and the facts are with the plaintiff, and that the defendants, and neither of them, have any right, title, or interest in and to Frio Street or Front Street East of and adjoining Dots Nos. Five (5), Six (6), Seven (7),…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Larrabee v. PorterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Spencer v. LevyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Gibbs v. AshfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902
- Newburg v. SpinhirneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Pullman v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- James v. HitchcockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
- City of Dallas v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
- Ward v. RiceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951