Legal Opinion
Hill v. Boufford
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 31, 1988PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Edward H. Lehner, J.
The principal issue raised on the motions before the court is whether it is illegal for the New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation (HHC) to contract with a private entity to provide supplementary emergency ambulance service.
On August 21, 1988 HHC entered into a contract with Metropolitan Ambulance Company (Metropolitan), a certified ambulance service as defined in section 3001 of the Public Health Law, to provide backup emergency ambulance service to the HHC Emergency Medical Service (EMS).
The contract provides that when no EMS unit is available…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- De Pina v. Educational Testing ServiceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
- Matter of Nassau Educ. Chapter of the Civil Serv. Employees Ass'n, Inc. v. Great Neck Union Free Sch. Dist.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Nassau Educational Chapter of the Civil Service Employees Ass'n v. Great Neck Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Coxen v. MeyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
3Cited by2 opinions
- New York City Health & Hospitals Corp. v. Council of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Hilsen v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998