The Heil Co. v. Evanston Insurance Company
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III, District Judge.
Evanston Insurance Company (“Evans-ton”) appeals the denial of its post-trial motion for judgment as a matter of law, or in the alternative to alter or amend the judgment. For the following reasons, we VACATE the jury’s verdict on The Heil Company’s claim for bad faith failure to settle and the associated $2 million punitive damages award, and REMAND for a new trial on those issues. We AFFIRM the jury’s finding that Evanston is liable under Tennessee Code Annotated § 56-7-105.
I
This litigation stems from a wrongful death action brought against The…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Sidney Morse v. R. Clayton McWhorterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- K & T Enterprises, Inc., D/B/A Dairy Queen of Blissfield, and Tahani Khoury v. Zurich Insurance Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- In Re: Estate of Martha M. TannerTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Christian Kreipke v. Wayne State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Tamarin Lindenberg v. Jackson Nat'l Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- John Riad v. Erie Insurance ExchangeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2013
- President of Georgetown College v. WheelerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Clift v. RDP Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2016
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.