Legal Opinion

State v. Wright

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 7, 1984Published

1Opinion of the Court

96 N.J. 170 (1984)

475 A.2d 38

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT,

v.

CHARLES WRIGHT, A/K/A MARK EDWARDS, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued November 29, 1983.

Decided May 7, 1984.

Mark Paul Cronin, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant and cross-respondent (Irwin I. Kimmelman, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Catherine A. Foddai, Deputy Attorney General, of counsel and on the briefs).

John M. Apicella, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for respondent and cross-appellant (Joseph H.…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. LeeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  2. State v. WrightSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  3. State v. WrightNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API