Legal Opinion
State v. Tate
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided November 24, 1999No. 99-K-1483PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
747 So.2d 519 (1999)
STATE of Louisiana
v.
Printess TATE.
No. 99-K-1483.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
November 24, 1999.
PER CURIAM:[*]
Writ granted in part; denied in part. The court of appeal erred in deleting the term "without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence" in its entirety from the defendant's sentence.
La.R.S. 15:529.1(G) provides that any sentence imposed under the statute's multiple offender provision "shall be without benefit of probation or suspension of sentence." The court of appeal therefore erred in eliminating those terms from the sentence imposed by the district…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. WashingtonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1990
3Cited by53 opinions
- State v. SpeedLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2009
- State v. HunterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2000
- Brown v. MayleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- State v. JohnsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
- State v. DupreeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2007
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.