Legal Opinion
Russo v. Miller
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided June 1, 1989PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WATHEN, Justice.
Following a bench trial, James Miller, Daniel Miller, and Jaydan Associates (hereinafter buyers) appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court, (Cumberland County, Fritzsche, J.) entered in favor of seller. The trial justice set aside a conveyance of real estate from Sandra Russo (hereinafter seller) to buyers on the grounds of undue influence. On appeal, buyers argue that the evidence does not support the application of the doctrine of undue influence. Finding no error, we affirm the judgment.
On June 4, 1986, seller instituted suit against James Miller, Daniel Miller, and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Taylor v. Commissioner of Mental Health & Mental RetardationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
- New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1976
- Rogers, In re the proposed will of DeeringSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1924
- Estate of RecordSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
- In Re LongworthSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1966
3Cited by7 opinions
- DesMarais v. DesjardinsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
- Rich v. FullerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
- Wood v. WoodSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
- Estate of DodgeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
- Dolloff v. DolloffSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.