Legal Opinion

United States v. Gray

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 27, 2004No. 03-5888PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

George E. Gray, proceeding through counsel, appeals his judgment of conviction and sentence. The parties have waived oral argument and this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed in this case. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).

On August 27, 2001, Gray pled guilty pursuant to a written plea agreement to counts one and seven of a nine count indictment. Count one charged Gray with conspiracy to manufacture and distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846, and count seven charged Gray with possession of a firearm in relation to a drug trafficking crime, in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. United States v. Ronald DupreeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  4. United States v. Malik WardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  5. United States v. Randy Glenn YoungCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gray v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Meza v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API