Legal Opinion
In re Spradling
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided January 26, 2007No. 2006-B-1971PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*643ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
2Per curiam
1 ¡This disciplinary matter arises from formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against the respondent, James Wallace Spradling, II, an attorney licensed to practice law in Louisiana, as well as in Oklahoma, Texas, and Massachusetts.
On August 21, 2003, the ODC filed a petition seeking respondent’s immediate interim suspension, on the ground that he is a threat of harm to the public. The ODC’s filing stemmed from three primary areas of concern, including respondent’s transfer of funds from his law firm’s client trust account to the…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
3Cases cited9 opinions
- Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
- Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. ReisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
- In Re QuaidSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. BoutallSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
- In Re BoltonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by1 opinion
- In re McCrumbSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2007