Potomac Leasing Co. v. Bulger
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
This is a dispute about an equipment lease contract. The plaintiff, Potomac Leasing Company, sued Henry R. Bulger for $3,965.42. That amount represented the accelerated lease payments on an ice cream machine Potomac claims Bulger had agreed to lease. Bulger counterclaimed, alleging that he had been defrauded by Potomac and its agent, Royal Equipment Company, and that the contract he had signed was unconscionable. Royal was added as a defendant. Potomac argued that Royal was not its agent and that Bulger was bound by the contract he signed. The jury returned a verdict against Potomac for…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Torres v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Roan v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
- Roberson v. AmmonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Mid-State Homes, Inc. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
- Dorcal, Inc. v. Xerox Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Standard Plan, Inc. v. TuckerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Battles v. Ford Motor Credit Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
- Talent Tree Personnel Serv., Inc. v. FleenorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
- Isaac v. Life Investors Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1990
- Cornett v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.