Legal Opinion

In Re Audey

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 9, 1986No. 19-02028PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOSEPH L. COSETTI, Chief Judge.

This dispute involves avoidance of a lien under 11 U.S.C. § 522(f) and determination of secured value under 11 U.S.C. § 506(a). The IRS raises the application of case law In re Simonson, 758 F.2d 103 (3d Cir.1985), as a defense to this lien avoidance action.

Frequently, the Bankruptcy Court is confronted by a fact situation in which judicial liens, as a matter of priority, are sandwiched between or are senior to mortgages. Although Section 522(f) permits judicial liens to be avoided, mortgages may not be avoided by § 522(f). This Court addressed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tanner v. FinanceAmerica Consumer Discount Co. (In Re Tanner)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Losieniecki v. Thrift Consumer Discount Co. (In Re Losieniecki)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1981

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dembo v. United States, Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service (In Re Dembo)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. In Re BaldwinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. McCullough v. United States (In Re McCullough)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. In re DilibertoDistrict Court, D. New York · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API