Legal Opinion

Filley v. Billings

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1889PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to the district court for Gage county. Tried below before Appelget, J. cited: B.& M. It. JR. Co. et al. v. Beebe, 14 Neb. 463; Oahes v. Weston, 45 Vt. 430; Co oh v. Broohway, 21 Barb. 331; B. & JMJ. JR. JR. Co. v. Sehkmtz, 14 Neb. 421; Fry v. Bennett, 3 Bosw. (N. Y.) 200; JHJaynie v. Baylor, 18 Tex. 498. cited : JR. V. JR. JR. v. Arnold, 13 Neb. 488; Wharton on Evidence, sec. 573.

1Opinion of the CourtCobb, J.

This cause was before this court at a former term on error to a former trial in the district court of Gage county. The judgment below, then, for the defendant, was reversed, and the cause remanded. The opinion is published in the 21st volume of our Reports, at pp. 511-25. Upon the second trial in the district court, a verdict and judgment were rendered for the plaintiff, and the cause is now brought forward again, on error, by the defendant.

*538Plaintiff in error, in his brief, presents fifteen points, which will be noticed separately or by convenient groups.

I. The- plaintiff, being on the stand…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mathews v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Billings v. FIlleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. International & G. N. Ry. Co. v. MuddCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API