Auman v. Hough
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 3, March T., 1906, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Clinton Co., Jan. T., 1902, No. 106, for plaintiff on case tried by court without a jury, in suit of William Auman v. Nathan Hough et al. Ejectment for 207 acres of unseated land in Logan Township. The case was- tried by Mayer, P. J., without a jury under the act of April 22,1874. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. Error assigned was in entering judgment for plaintiff.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Morbison, J.,
This is an action of ejectment brought to recover possession of 207 acres of unseated land, said to be located in Logan township, Clinton county. The plaintiff claimed under a treasurers’ sale of unseated lands, made January 26, 1893, for the nonpayment of taxes attempted to be assessed for the years 1890 and 1891. The treasurers’ sale and the deed made in pursuance thereof are conceded to be regular, if there was a valid assessment of the land described in the writ of ejectment. It is also conceded that the title attempted to be made by said sale and deed was regularly…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Strauch v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1841
- City of Philadelphia v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1865
- Fisk v. CoreySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
- Glass v. GilbertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
- Lyman v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bannard v. New York State Natural Gas Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Edgewood Building Co. v. Pernsley, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County1974
- First National Bank v. Serro, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Westmoreland County1944
- Reichley v. Mellott, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Fulton County1929