Legal Opinion

Cummins v. . City of Syracuse

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 8, 1885PublishedCited by 3 opinions

This action was brought to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been sustained through defendant’s negligence. Plaintiff, who resided at Rochester, went to Syracuse, where he arrived at midnight, and went with several others, among them a brakeman, who carried a lantern, to a saloon on West Fayette street in said city; said street crosses Onondaga creek by a bridge, which the party crossed in going to the house; on the street north of West Fayette street, and…

Read the full summary

This action was brought to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been sustained through defendant’s negligence. Plaintiff, who resided at Rochester, went to Syracuse, where he arrived at midnight, and went with several others, among them a brakeman, who carried a lantern, to a saloon on West Fayette street in said city; said street crosses Onondaga creek by a bridge, which the party crossed in going to the house; on the street north of West Fayette street, and directly north of the bridge is the depot of the New York Central railroad. The saloon was on the south side of West Fayette…

1Per curiam

opinion for reversal and new trial.

All concur, except Danforth, J., dissenting, and Finch, J., not voting.

Judgment reversed.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dale v. Webster CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
  2. Atwater v. Town of VeteranNew York Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Byrne v. City of SyracuseNew York Supreme Court · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API