Legal Opinion

United States v. Edward Rose & Sons

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided February 21, 2003No. 02-73518PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION; DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO TRANSFER; AND, GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT

ROBERTS, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint and for Entry of a Preliminary Injunction, and Defendant’s Motion to Transfer. For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint, GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Injunction, and…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Morton v. RuizSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Hoffman v. BlaskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Trafficante v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Leary v. DaeschnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Taigen & Sons, Inc.District Court, D. Idaho · 2003
  2. Jafri v. Chandler LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
  3. United States v. Noble Homes, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2016
  4. United States v. Scotty's Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2016
  5. Gamane v. DiamondDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API