Young v. Roe
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The mother is presumptively entitled to custody by force of the decree of a sister state making such award. The New York court, however, is not without power to make a different award if intervening and current circumstances have changed. (Ansorge v. Armour, 267 N. Y. 492; Restatement, Conflict of Laws, §§ 147, 148, and New York Annotations.) The evidence requires a finding that the welfare of the child will be better promoted under the custody of the father. It does not appear that the mother has a permanent home or a firm source of income. There appears to be a suitable degree of domestic…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ansorge v. ArmourNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
3Cited by9 opinions
- Schacht v. SchachtNew York Family Court · 1946
- Guyette v. HaleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- Sutera v. SuteraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956
- Harless v. HarlessNew York Family Court · 1948
- In re the Custody of ForbellNew York Supreme Court · 1950
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.