District of Columbia v. J.R.M.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
FERREN, Associate Judge:
The District of Columbia appeals the denial of its petition to establish paternity and to order appellee, J.R.M., to pay child support. Among its contentions, the District argues that Judge Bacon erred by requiring the District to prove paternity. Earlier, Judge Beaudin had stricken J.R. M.’s answer to the petition as a sanction for his failure to take a Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) test, which he had previously agreed to take. In the District’s view that sanction, eliminating J.R.M.’s denial of paternity, in effect established paternity and thus left to be determined…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Braxton v. Howard UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Garces v. BradleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973
- L.C.D. v. District of Columbia Ex Rel. T.-A.H.D.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Ungar Motors v. AbdemoulaieDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- LaPrade v. LehmanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- S.A. v. M.A.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- District of Columbia ex rel. W.J.D. v. E. McB.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- S.A. v. M.A.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Sa v. MaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987