Berger v. Berger
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HOWE, Justice:
Defendant, Philip Herman Berger, appeals from the property division made in this divorce action. He seeks either a new trial or a redistribution of the marital estate.
When the Bergers were married in 1969, plaintiff, Kathleen Marie Berger, was a thirty-two-year-old legal secretary with a high school diploma. Defendant was twenty-eight years old, worked as a television repairman, and had completed three years toward a degree in electrical engineering. Neither brought assets of substantial value into the marriage, except that Mrs. Berger had a $2,000 equity in a house. He returned…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Stanley v. StanleyUtah Supreme Court · 1939
- Wiese v. WieseUtah Supreme Court · 1970
- Mitchell v. MitchellUtah Supreme Court · 1974
- Fletcher v. FletcherUtah Supreme Court · 1980
- Olivero v. ElegantiUtah Supreme Court · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dahl v. DahlUtah Supreme Court · 2015
- Dahl v. DahlUtah Supreme Court · 2015
- Dahl v. DahlUtah Supreme Court · 2015
- Lee v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2002
- Lee v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2002