Legal Opinion

Berger v. Berger

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1985No. 18627PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWE, Justice:

Defendant, Philip Herman Berger, appeals from the property division made in this divorce action. He seeks either a new trial or a redistribution of the marital estate.

When the Bergers were married in 1969, plaintiff, Kathleen Marie Berger, was a thirty-two-year-old legal secretary with a high school diploma. Defendant was twenty-eight years old, worked as a television repairman, and had completed three years toward a degree in electrical engineering. Neither brought assets of substantial value into the marriage, except that Mrs. Berger had a $2,000 equity in a house. He returned…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stanley v. StanleyUtah Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Wiese v. WieseUtah Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Mitchell v. MitchellUtah Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Fletcher v. FletcherUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Olivero v. ElegantiUtah Supreme Court · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dahl v. DahlUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Dahl v. DahlUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Dahl v. DahlUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Lee v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2002
  5. Lee v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API